Wednesday, 03 March 2010 21:50
Film Reviews
Sooooo I just watched 'Mao's Last Dancer', a film I had been anticipating and couldn't wait to see. Disappointing. The script and acting were uniformly bad but I don't believe the latter was the fault of the actors: the Script (by Jan Sardi) was sooooooo trite and corny that it robbed the story (which is a goodie) of any impact whatsoever. I felt that had the story been told by Chen Kaige or some other Chinese director, it would have had more meaning. As it was, Sardi's heavyhanded script, reliant on such devices as fart jokes and fish-out-of-water misunderstandings of language, was like fingernails on a blackboard. Li Cunxin was an extraordinary dancer and the dancing segments were good to look at but his personal discipline and fortitude really were given scant attention. The acting was hampered by the fact that all American fakes (including Penne Hackforth Jones) were caricatures with terrible accents including Jack THompson's cameo as a judge who saves the day. Just get an American for Pete's sake and write lines that echo the cadence of American speech!!! But one thing was intriguing: the set for the Stravinsky ballet (choreog. Graeme Murphy) and the device of the flame flashing up the shards was IDENTICAL to David Atkins' Opening and closing central motif. Given that David has always been a central part of Sydney's modern dance scene, this may not have been a coincidence. But if I had been the set director, I would have asked for a credit in Vancouver. Or maybe not... after all, it failed to function there! Peter James' cinematography was spot-on and you could see he had a lot of budget-coverups to achieve. I was just so disappointed in this overall production and annoyed that such a good story was completely squandered by what has become the Sardi stamp of corniness. As with "Shine" (Dir.: Scott Hicks, 1996), the hero was made out to have no warts and the lack of rounding of his character made for an annoying, flat as a tack story which, for me, could not be covered up by the dancing. The saturation of dance events and shows on our screens at the moment also means that we are so accustomed to seeing footwork and line covered well, that it is hard to tolerate anything that misses the chance to go for art rather than workmanlike coverage. But, hey! It is way better than some of the films out of Australia over past years.
|
Thursday, 14 January 2010 19:01
Film Reviews
Up In The Air (Jason Reitman, 2009, USA) | Rating M Running time 98 minutes |  | | | | | Synopsis: Ryan Bingham (George Clooney) is a cool and detached hatchet man subcontracting to companies who haven't the guts to fire their staff. He has the vocab to pull it off without any negatives. With 322 days of the year spent flying from city to city, he is a loyalty card freak with umpteen frequent flyer miles, and his packing ability puts anyone to shame. When young and ambitious Natalie (Anna Kendrick) joins the company she brings some radical new ideas that could threaten Bingham’s job. He decides to teach her the reality and they fly off together. En route, he meets Alex (Vera Farmiga), his female doppelganger, comes up against family pressures and is forced to reassess both his business and his emotional life. Jason Reitman (Juno, 2007) and (Thank You For Smoking 2005) is a great director of tales with truly modern themes and this one is a real recession tale of how job cuts can impact on the middle class, He wrote this script with Sheldon Turner, from the book by Walter Kirn. There are some aspects of the book that are missing in the film, but see the film first and you won't be broken-hearted. George Clooney, is truly urbane and fabulous in the lead role, earning and deserving many awards. The story moves along briskly and has much detail you could miss. I enjoyed it greatly on second viewing. The motivational seminar to business people entitled “What’s In Your Backpack?” that advocates keeping life simple materially and emotionally is hilarious and anyone who has attended one of these sessions will relate to it. A film with witty dialogue and modern situations, it has simply perfect acting with all aspects of film-craft suppporting the director's crystal clear vision. There is something in 'Up in the Air' that reminds me of the screwball comedies of past years.
|
Monday, 11 January 2010 01:07
Film Reviews
Peter Jackson's film, 'The Lovely Bones' is being touted around as being up for Oscar consideration. 'Fraid it doesn't rate that well in my estimation. it has a couple of glaring flaws, the most annoying ones being the narration (radio with pictures), a music score that does nothing for the narrative, some very 'out of kilter' scenes that pop up for no reason and some very odd casting. The animation, also, is somewhat klunky. Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Weisz are cast as the parents of a deep-thinking, pubescent girl, her younger sister and brother in a 1970s house that allows Marie Mark to wear his fine mullett and flares. Rachel is by far too pretty for the part and Mark looks kind of kerflummoxed throughout. Stanley Tucci, however, is just grand in his portrayal of a serial killer and his presence on the screen each time sends chills down viewers' spines. Saoirse Ronan plays the central part, a young girl murdered by a serial killer. We see the story through her (dead) eyes which is often blown out for no apparent reason with musical montages and interludes of heaven and purgatory. The screenplay is quite clumsy and there is no real view of character outside that of Mr. Harvey, (Tucci) and somehow, the film took me back in design to Jackson's breakout film, 'Heaveanly Creatures' 1994. By far the best scene was with the sister, Lindsey, conducting her own detective work and had the film contained more of these suspenseful moments it would have been less of a trial to watch. Adaptations are always difficult but this one seems to have only contained enough material for a short film and I had the feeling that it was padded out to movie length with pointless straying into Elysian fields. If you see only one film a month, don't choose this one. If you are a writer, however, watch it on DVD when it is released near you and try to figure out how you would approach a rewrite! At least then you won't have wasted your time watching the film.
Saturday, 09 January 2010 04:25
Film Reviews
Apologies for the gap between posts - have been busy. But I have lately caught up with some film, 'Precious' (Dir.:Lee Daniels, 2009) being the latest and I was pleasantly surprised at the powerful acting performances from all cast members. The story is of a dyslexic, obese girl, Precious, who is pregnant with her second baby, the result of being raped since the age of three by her father. Kicked out of school by a powerless Principal, she is referred to an alternative school and there, the teachers unravel her ghastly problems and give her some reason to hope and continue her struggle. You will, I am sure, have seen plenty of trailers and clips on talk shows, so you will have the gist of the story, and yes, it is worth it seeing Mariah Carey making up for past filmic mortal sins by giving a clean and clear acting performance (unplugged and unmadeup) so I won't duplicate any of that but the format and screenplay were both extremely effective in telling this lurid and confronting tale. I am not a fan of voice over but in 'Precious', it gives us glimpses of the girl's hopes and dreams that could not otherwise havebeen seen. The book 'Push' (Sapphire) is a monologue and the detail is vital. My only criticism is of the audio and many speeches are lost due to accents, swallowing of words and the naturalistic approach. Sometimes I would have liked subtitles! However, it is an Oscar contender and will probably win for Mo'nique's performance if nothing else. The star of the film, newcomer, Gabourey 'Gabby' Sidibe has great potential as an actress, sustaining a harrowing role with enormous aplomb. She has great depth in her eyes and expression. However, she must be cared for by a really thoughtful crew of agents now, be encouraged to lose the obesity and make the most of what should be a massive boost to the potential of her future. With her health as the key, young Gabby needs to trim down and I could see her with a great career as a versatile actress. I have lately seen her on talk shows and she displays a personality and intelligence that will stand her in good stead and help her make hay while the sun is shining at its brightest on this, a fabulous start to any career she wants! I'd certainly look forward to seeing her in other roles. The tale of Oprah and Tyler Perry getting on board after seeing the film at Sundance is well known, and it is good to see these two once again putting their money to great use. Good luck all at the Oscars!
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 19:13
TV Reviews
Lately, I have seen a mix of Canadian, Mexican, Brazilian and American telly programmes and shock, horreur! I have begun to miss Australian television, notably, the predictability of it and the set programme that allows you to pre-select what to watch. Sure, you can do that if you have TiVo or something like it, but where I am, there's no set programme. It is just a matter of luck if you catch the beginning of the film as there are so many channels in the mish mash of cable we have, that we are constantly guessing what to watch each day. Hmmm. This must also make it hell for programme makers as prime time slips and slides according to the time zone you happen to access. Somtimes we get French programmes, other times not. Ditto the Spanish and Portuguese. While we can access Omni, a multicultural station, it is not a patch on SBS with the sensitive programming it had when it was set up by Paddy Conroy in the early days. Of course, we know that it has been spoiled by current management. The knowledge of English is actually enhanced by understanding other languages and the pope gave the world a raw deal when the latin mass was banned and poor translations of the bible were approved. The news here is excremental. I have no idea what is happening without consulting the internet (TG for that invention). News in Detroit, Seattle, Toronto, New York, L.A., Atlanta, Hong Kong is light, ill-researched, gibberish and with the exception of the serious lady in Detroit, Carmen, the readers are plain awful. I must say that I miss KNOWING what time the news is on and having it line up with my activities. Maybe I am just spoilt? Maybe this is just a plot to get us to buy TVs with the internet on board so that it is all online and then there will be no more TV news services at all, just crappy stories badly filmed on phones and digital stills cameras on their shaky cam. I do like Iron Chef America for its witty scripting and the American Dancing with the Stars for its hosts and incredible band. Wardrobe was marginally better in Australia though. Apart from that, there's Survivor Samoa, (nice to have on while doing something else) an occasional film if we catch them, Jeopardy (right up to date with that!) and good when Hamish and Andy are guests on the awful Jay Leno Show.Those chaps are funny AND NICE!!
|
|