It's always unnerving to see the opening titles with the lead star as E.P. and 'While she was out' has Kim Basinger doubling as heroine and persuader, each role suffering at the hands of an inexperienced director, also doubling as writer. In general, a short story is a perfect adaptation vehicle for a film. Short, snappy, linear with its peaks and troughs clearly enunciated. Not so with this one as the opening is mired in sludge and is as slow as those last few hours before Santa arrives, which is when it is set. Needing to get away from her nasty-piece-of-work hubby, Della (Kim B.) whizzes out on Christmas Eve to buy some last minute wrapping paper. And to have a secret smoke as her ciggies are in the car. Not so secret as the nasty-piece-of-work has already sussed out her stash. Eventually parking, she leaves a note on the windscreen of a thoughtless bastard who has occupied 2 parking spaces. That's her mistake and what follows is a complex chase with a handful of violent and well-made-up deaths. Oh, a scene of Kim taking a pee in a flowing creek. OK, so Huey Lewis set that precedent in 'Short Cuts'. But when the baddie (Chuckie, just like that murderous doll) calls 'Della, Della!!!!' with all the agony of Marlon Brando in 'Streetcar...' the audience lost control and cackles broke out.
Should we have been laughing? It had all the ingredients of a scary thriller. Chases a-plenty, a multi-racial gang of chasers, angst and tension at home so Della didn't want to go home, two cute kids who were threatened, and a pretty but gutsy lead character who had more moxie than we would have guessed at the start of the movie. She was no housewife though. On that score, it seemed that the kids were to blame, being messy and lazy and no wonder Della was down. She also was peri-menopausal and her husband was one of those guys more likely to be seen in a Todd Haynes film about the 50s & 60s...
The fundamental problem is that the actions are not causes or consequences for the most part, and little of what we see on the screen is motivated or with an exciting and substantially rewarding payback. Such as the perfume reference, the fact that the wrapping paper is sodden at the end of the film, that pissing scene and so on. Much clever layering could have taken this from a C+ to an A. Some of the lines were just hokey. So Susan Mountford was probably a light hand at directing, more worried about getting through this, her first film, without too much of a budget over-run and not taking the time to think out what the dialogue was supposed to be doing for the story. Also, as writer/director and I bet doing the big financing runaround, she was exhausted when the shoot began and burnt out during the post.
Am I being too nasty? Well maybe. It was an adequate first film and certainly not as horrendous as some I could mention. But then 'Pulp Fiction' was QT's first film ...
WR